Editorial Team

Editor in chief

Giuliana Di Biase [academia.edu], Università degli Studi di Chieti-Pescara “Gabriele d’Annunzio”

Associate Editors

Deputy Editors

Luisa Simonutti, Istituto per la storia del pensiero filosofico e scientifico moderno-CNR

Diego Lucci, American University in Bulgaria (AUBG)

Editorial Assistant

Emilio Maria De Tommaso, Università della Calabria.

Editorial Board

Guido Giglioni, Università degli Studi di Macerata

Davide Poggi, Università degli Studi di Verona

Raffaele Russo, University of Innsbruck

Matteo Favaretti Camposampiero, Università Ca' Foscari di Venezia

Charles Wolfe, Université Toulouse 2

International Scientific Board

Igor Agostini, Università del Salento

Peter Anstey, University of Sidney

Ruth Boeker, University College Dublin

Sorana Corneanu, University of Bucharest

Adriano Fabris, Università di Pisa

Marco Forlivesi, Università degli Studi di Chieti-Pescara "Gabriele d'Annunzio"

Mark Goldie, Churchill College, University of Cambridge

Jessica Gordon-Roth, University of Minnesota

Philippe Hamou, Université Paris Nanterre

Benjamin Hill, Western University, Canada

Sarah Hutton, University of York

Antonia LoLordo, University of Virginia

Montserrat Herrero, Universidad de Navarra

Victor Nuovo, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT

Maria-Cristina Pitassi, University of Geneva

Martine Pécharman, Centre de Recherches sur les Arts et le Langage/ EHESS/CNRS

Paul Schuurman, Erasmus University Rotterdam

John Simmons, University of Virginia

Timothy Stanton, University of York

Jean-Michel Vienne, Centre atlantique de philosophie (CAPHI), University of Nantes-University of Rennes

Shelley Weinberg, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Richard Yeo, Griffith University

For the editorial production process, the journal relies on three different bodies: the editors, the editorial board, and the scientific committee. The editors are responsible for the entire editorial process, the transparency of the publication methods, and the composition of the issue summaries. As stated in the Ethics Statement, the editors ensure that all actors involved in the review and production process fulfill their obligations. The editors are responsible for the initial evaluation of submissions, which are judged on the basis of the completeness of the material provided, scientific integrity, and compatibility with the journal's scientific objectives. Only the editors can decide whether to initiate the review process, to skip it (in very rare cases, due to an author's exceptional prestige), or to reject the proposal ex officio. The direction liaises with the editorial board to ensure a transparent peer review process, linguistic appropriateness of submissions, and adherence to the journal's editorial standards. Members of the editorial board may not be involved in the peer review process as reviewers, except in rare cases where such members are considered to be the leading experts on a particular topic. In such cases, which the editors and the editorial board undertake to limit, the other members of the editorial board will manage communication with the author(s) while protecting their identity and that of the reviewer(s); if the proposal is published, any coincidence will be declared on the first page of the paginated article. The sole function of the scientific committee is to guarantee the scientific prestige of the journal. Its members are never involved in the editorial process of the issues. If they are asked to act as anonymous reviewers, the editorial board will exercise its function as in other cases.