The Relationship of Application as a Triadic Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/58xtfe27Keywords:
Interpretation, Qualification, Subsumption, Primary sentences and secondary sentences, Judicial syllogismAbstract
The term “application” in the title of this paper refers to the application of legal sentences. In previous works on this subject, I have described the application of legal sentences as if it were a dyadic relationship between a legal sentence and a judicial decision resolving a dispute. I have adopted this approach for reasons of simplification, but it has two drawbacks: first, it obscures the importance of identifying the specific or contentious case involved when determining whether a particular judicial decision does or does not apply a given legal sentence; second, it prevents us from recognising the relationships and independence among several issues encompassed by the topic of the application of legal sentences. In this paper, I aim to address these shortcomings by treating the relationship of application as a triadic relationship among a judicial decision resolving a dispute, a legal sentence, and a concrete case.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyrights are transferred for 18 months starting publication date from the author(s) to the Publisher. After this period, the content is released under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International).