Mulholland (Death) Drive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/fjxbqn93Keywords:
Dream, Fantasy, The Real, Subjectivity, InterpretationAbstract
This essay proposes David Lynch’s Mulholland Dr. as a site for rethinking dream experience, where the opposition between reality and illusion collapse into a tension among fantasy, desire, and the Real. Rather than treating the film as the dream of a single subject, it argues that Lynch constructs an oneiric dispositif in which subjectivity is unstable and finally dissolves. The film’s interstitial sequences – Diane’s corpse, the doubling of Rita and Betty, Club Silencio, the blue box – mark the erosion of any subject who could claim the dream as “hers.” What emerges is not a hidden truth but an object that persists independently of subjective anchoring: the voice continuing after Del Rio’s collapse, the grinning elderly couple, the box itself. These elements function not as symbols but as operators of impersonal enjoyment, indices of a Real anterior to subject and object. In this sense, Mulholland Dr. constructs a cinematic topology in which the dream ceases to be meaningful and instead reveals the inhuman kernel that structures subjectivity: the object, as death drive, that dreams through the subject.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyrights are transferred for five years starting publication date from the author(s) to the Publisher. After this period, the content is released under a Creative Commons license (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International).